Mergers & Acquisitions
Thorough, pragmatic Buy-Side Due Diligence that helps you understand the financial story behind the numbers before you close.

Preview of an Appletree Quality of Earnings Report
Quality of Earnings and Financial Due Diligence Projects
Typical Acquisition Size
More Affordable Than Large Regional CPA Firms
Our Team of CPAs Have Personally Acquired Businesses
Education
A Quality of Earnings Report, also called a QOE Report or Financial Due Diligence Analysis, helps buyers understand whether a company's reported earnings reflect its true operating performance before completing an acquisition.
Ultimately, it answers one simple question: are the numbers real, and are they sustainable?
A thorough Quality of Earnings Analysis gives buyers, lenders, and investors the clarity to close with confidence, or walk away before a costly mistake.
Is revenue recurring, reliable, and accurately reported?
Which add-backs and normalizations are legitimate?
What capital is actually needed to run the business?
Is the business generating real, consistent free cash flow?
Concentration risk and single-customer dependency.
Is the business growing, stable, or declining, and why?
Liabilities or obligations that should reduce the purchase price.
A company is worth what it can keep earning, so the useful question about historical results is which parts of them will continue. Appletree reviews reported earnings against what the business actually sustains, and reports the difference.
A single customer can account for most of recent revenue. A one-time expense can turn out to recur every year. We surface those before they surface in negotiation, when they cost far more to absorb.
The same review that flags concentration risk and unsupported add-backs also finds margin the seller never highlighted. Buyers use both: one to reprice the deal, the other to plan the first year of ownership.
Lenders and investment committees want the earnings figure defended, not asserted. We give you an adjusted number with the reasoning attached, so the people funding the deal can follow how it was reached.

Quality of earnings reviews are most commonly associated with mergers and acquisitions, although they can be valuable in several situations.
A business owner preparing to sell a company may obtain a sell-side quality of earnings review before entering the later stages of a transaction. Reviewing the financials in advance can identify issues that a prospective buyer is likely to question and give the seller an opportunity to organize supporting information.
A buyer may use a buy-side QoE review during financial due diligence to determine whether the earnings presented by the seller are supported by the underlying records. Investors and lenders may also want greater visibility into financial performance before committing capital.
Who We Help
Appletree's Quality of Earnings and Financial Due Diligence work is built for buyers across the lower middle market.
Search Funds
SBA Buyers
Acquisition Entrepreneurs
Private Equity
Independent Sponsors
Strategic Buyers
Business Buyers
Lenders and Investors
Appletree specializes in business acquisitions with purchase prices typically between $1M and $15M, the sweet spot for Search Funds, SBA Buyers, Acquisition Entrepreneurs, and Lower Middle Market Private Equity firms.
Our Process
A clear, defined process from first call to final report, you'll always know exactly where things stand.
We learn about your acquisition, deal timeline, and what you need from the engagement.
We send a structured request list to gather the seller's financial records.
Our CPAs dig into revenue, EBITDA, working capital, cash flow, and risk factors.
We deliver your QOE Report and the Appletree Acquisition Scorecard with clear findings.
We walk through the report, answer questions, and give practical recommendations.
Sample Report
Our Quality of Earnings Reports are built to be clear, actionable, and buyer-ready, not dense with accounting jargon. Every Quality of Earnings Report includes our proprietary Acquisition Scorecard: a plain-English summary of exactly what we found and what it means for your decision.


One of the most important concepts in many quality of earnings engagements is normalized earnings. A company's reported results reflect what actually occurred during a particular period. Normalized results attempt to show what earnings might have looked like without unusual, nonrecurring, or owner-specific items that are not considered part of ordinary continuing operations.
EBITDA, which refers to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, is commonly used in business transactions as one measure of operating performance. Transaction discussions may also involve adjusted EBITDA, which makes additional adjustments to reported results.
Quality of earnings analysis can be valuable on either side of a transaction, although the objectives may differ.

A seller preparing for a transaction may want to understand how a prospective buyer is likely to view the company's financial information.
A sell-side quality of earnings review can help identify potential questions before buyer due diligence becomes intensive. It may also help organize supporting documentation for adjustments, explain unusual financial periods, and establish a more defensible picture of normalized performance.
Addressing these matters before entering serious negotiations may reduce the likelihood that easily explainable financial issues become unnecessary obstacles later.

A buyer needs to understand what is actually producing the earnings of a target business.
Buy-side analysis can provide additional insight into revenue consistency, margins, expenses, adjustments, customer concentration, and other factors that may affect the economics of an acquisition.
The findings can help a buyer determine where additional diligence is needed and better understand the assumptions underlying a proposed transaction.
A quality of earnings review and a financial statement audit are different services with different objectives.
An audit is performed under specific professional standards and is designed to provide an opinion regarding whether financial statements are presented fairly, in all material respects, according to the applicable financial reporting framework.
A quality of earnings review is typically a transaction-focused financial analysis. Rather than issuing an audit opinion, the QoE process focuses on understanding the composition and sustainability of earnings, evaluating financial trends, and identifying issues that may be relevant to a buyer, seller, lender, or investor. A company can therefore have accurate financial statements and still benefit substantially from a quality of earnings review before a transaction.
Why Appletree
100+ Quality of Earnings and Financial Due Diligence engagements - purpose-built for the lower middle market, not corporate M&A.
Real pattern recognition built across more than 100 Quality of Earnings and Financial Due Diligence engagements.
Focused on the lower middle market, SBA deals, search funds, and acquisition entrepreneurs at the size that matters to you.
Acquisition buyers across the country rely on Appletree for independent Buy-Side Due Diligence.
Our CPAs have personally bought businesses, so we know what buyers actually need, not just what looks good on paper.
Practical, buyer-focused findings, not dense technical reports that need a second interpreter.
QOE Analysis at a fee that fits real acquisition budgets, typically well below large regional CPA firms.
Generic, templated reports
Built for large corporate transactions
Higher fees, less accessible
Limited real acquisition experience
Technical reports that are hard to interpret
100+ Quality of Earnings and Financial Due Diligence engagements
Designed for $1M–$15M business acquisitions
CPAs who have personally acquired businesses
Clear, actionable reports you can actually use
Typically 20–50% more affordable than large regional firms
Community Partners
Many of our Quality of Earnings clients come from some of the most respected communities in small business M&A.

Industry Recognition
Our team has also been featured on respected podcasts focused on business acquisitions, search funds, and the lower middle market.

Bookkeeping Services: Maintain organized, timely financial records that provide a clearer picture of business performance.



Appletree runs quality of earnings reviews remotely for acquisitions across the country, working from accounting files, bank records, and management interviews. The analysis does not change with distance, though industry and deal structure both change it considerably.
The firm works from offices in Londonderry and Portsmouth, New Hampshire, and takes on transactions wherever the buyer and the target happen to be.
The scope depends on the company and transaction, but a quality of earnings review commonly analyzes historical revenue, operating expenses, profitability, EBITDA adjustments, nonrecurring items, owner-related expenses, customer concentration, margins, working capital trends, and other factors that may affect sustainable earnings.
The review may also evaluate supporting documentation for significant adjustments and identify financial trends or inconsistencies that deserve additional investigation.
A financial statement audit and a quality of earnings review serve different purposes.
An audit is performed according to established professional standards and provides an opinion regarding financial statements. A QoE review is generally performed as part of transaction-related financial due diligence and focuses on understanding the composition, consistency, and sustainability of earnings.
A quality of earnings review does not replace an audit, nor does an audit necessarily provide the transaction-specific analysis available through a QoE engagement.
The timeline varies depending on the size and complexity of the company, the scope of the engagement, the quality of existing financial records, and how quickly requested information can be provided.
Businesses with organized accounting records and accessible supporting documentation generally make the review process more efficient. Companies preparing for a future sale can benefit from addressing bookkeeping and reporting issues before transaction due diligence begins.
Adjusted EBITDA begins with EBITDA and makes additional adjustments intended to account for certain unusual, nonrecurring, discretionary, or transaction-specific items.
Common proposed adjustments may include one-time professional fees, unusual repairs, certain owner-specific expenses, or other costs that are not expected to continue under new ownership.
Every adjustment should be evaluated individually. Simply labeling an expense an "add-back" does not necessarily mean it represents a valid adjustment to sustainable earnings.
For some businesses, completing a sell-side QoE review before intensive buyer due diligence can be valuable.
The process can identify financial issues, help support legitimate adjustments, improve the organization of financial information, and reveal questions a prospective buyer may raise. Addressing those matters earlier can help the seller enter due diligence better prepared.
A buyer may benefit from a QoE review when the target company's historical earnings are an important factor in determining value or negotiating transaction terms.
The analysis can help the buyer understand what produced reported profits, whether proposed adjustments are supportable, and which financial trends deserve additional consideration before completing the acquisition.

Major business transactions require more than a quick review of an income statement. Understanding where earnings come from, what has influenced historical performance, and which results may be sustainable can provide valuable context before you commit to a sale, acquisition, or investment.
Whether you are preparing your company for a sale, evaluating an acquisition, or seeking greater confidence in the financial information behind a transaction, our team can help you understand the numbers before important decisions are made. Schedule your free consultation with Appletree Business Services today to discuss your quality of earnings review and the next steps for your transaction.


Get bookkeeping, payroll, tax, and advisory support from a proactive team that understands electrical contracting and the unique financial challenges your business faces.
A quality of earnings review, often referred to as a QoE review, is a detailed financial analysis used to determine how closely a company's reported earnings reflect its normal, sustainable operating performance.
Financial statements may be accurate while still including items that make current profitability different from what a new owner or investor could reasonably expect going forward. A business might have experienced an unusual one-time expense, received nonrecurring income, paid discretionary expenses for an owner, changed accounting practices, or benefited from circumstances that are unlikely to continue. A quality of earnings review helps put those items into context.
Every company is different, which means a quality of earnings engagement should reflect the size, complexity, transaction, and available records of the business being reviewed.
Appletree approaches the process with a focus on clear financial analysis, practical communication, and information that business owners and transaction participants can use.

The process begins with understanding the company and the reason for the review. We discuss the business model, transaction context, reporting structure, available accounting records, and areas requiring particular attention. This initial stage also helps establish the appropriate scope of the quality of earnings review.
Financial information may include income statements, balance sheets, general ledger data, tax information, payroll records, revenue reports, bank information, and supporting documentation relevant to significant adjustments. The objective is to establish a reliable foundation for the analysis before drawing conclusions from the numbers.
The next stage focuses on examining historical financial performance and understanding the factors behind reported earnings. We look for trends, inconsistencies, unusual transactions, and items that may require additional explanation. Depending on the scope of the engagement, this can include evaluating proposed adjustments to reported EBITDA and determining whether those adjustments reflect expenses or income that are genuinely nonrecurring.
Once the analysis is complete, the findings are organized into a clear report that explains the important financial observations uncovered during the review.
Rather than presenting unexplained numbers, an effective quality of earnings report should help users understand what those numbers mean and why particular adjustments or trends matter. Our team can also help business owners understand the findings and determine what additional financial preparation may be appropriate as a transaction progresses.